Skip to main content

26/11 Trial, Media and Capital Punishment


The 26/11 trial is barely over. People are patient. But the media isn't.

The shrill voice of news readers wants punishment to be delivered in the manner of 24X7 reporting. While waiting for the judgment, hysteria is being orchestrated more or less demanding a time table to hang the only 26/11 terrorist captured alive.

At the final stage of the trial, while the arguments are being heard on the punishment for those found guilty, an unseemly ‘debate’ is being carried on almost non stop in some of the TV channels. This borders on baying for blood, almost equating justice to revenge.

Debate on death penalty is relevant. In a very large number of democracies it is not on the statues.

But, in the present debate anyone who takes a moral position against capital punishment is almost made to look unpatriotic.

The discussion is not about leniency to a particular criminal. It is not on showing mercy or a lesser punishment.

Debate is not whether this particular criminal deserves capital punishment. It is for the court to decide on the quantum of punishment. Surely, not on public demand! Not by SMS polls!

And, it is certainly not right for the media to attempt influencing the judiciary - directly or indirectly.

Discussion is about capital punishment itself, in absolute terms: whether it should be there in the statutes at all. It is not about patriotism.

It is commendable that India, without dithering, tried the terrorist under the normal judicial process and brought the trial to a successful conclusion, at great cost. In contrast, USA finds it difficult to adequately deal with the terrorists within its judicial system.

There is no justification to whip up emotions while the Honorable Court is about to pronounce the verdict.

It will be a grave mistake to incite the public into thinking that executions must be carried out in the shortest possible time and preferably, it would appear, within days after the trial court gives the verdict. This is not how a sound justice system is supposed to work.

Once we accepted that a normal trial will be conducted and the due process of law will be allowed to take its course, we must have the trust and patience to allow that to run its full course.

The media must stop baying for blood and get back to the task of reporting and informing, seriously. That is surely more challenging and useful than orchestrating calibrated melodrama in an emotional news room.

PS:

Perhaps, it makes sense to keep the young terrorist to be condemned for a life in prison. Capital punishment may turn out to be the spurious martyrdom that the terrorist longs for. A quick and violent death is the easy way out: to escape from facing the reality of misdeeds and its personal consequences.

Note

According to Amnesty International, more than two-thirds of the countries of the world have abolished the death penalty in law or in practice. While 58 countries retained the death penalty in 2009, most did not use it. [http://www.amnesty.org/en/death-penalty]

Many countries, such as Mexico, Canada and most European nations, will not allow extradition if there is likelihood of death penalty for the suspect… [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extradition]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Indian Space Program and Recent Reporting – Hype vs Facts: A Quick Look

Was planning to write a long note on the inflated hue and cry over India’s space program. This is a summary of my views without going into the details. Of late, every successful event of the Indian space programme is celebrated as if it is a ‘historic’ one. An impression is given as if the whole program is merely a few years old and all that it has achieved has been in a short period of a few years. To be more specific, unlike in the case of the missions of countries like the USA, when Indian media reports on the Indian missions readers do not get any idea as to when the mission was planned and what kind of effort has gone into it. Just like the Mars Mission launched towards the end of 2013 , the various satellite launches are the result of many years of planning to ensure that India has a series of satellites of different capabilities and there are replacements as old satellites are retired.  India’s Mars Orbiter Mission that was placed into an orbit around Mars in September 2014

A Pestilence - The Karatified-Left

These days there is a certain brand of unwelcome Leftists who pop up when some of us discuss either the dangers of sanghi fascism or start conversations about building wider unity to defeat these fascists. They appear mainly to question the discussions on unity against the sanghi-fascism and to discredit vehemently the Congress, avoiding the question of countering the sanghi fascists. When we look up their worldviews or the overall demeanour, they appear to be left-leaning. Strangely, they never discuss anything about fighting the sanghi-fascists. When it comes to discussing trends like this, we need some labels or short descriptions for those exhibiting similar traits, expressing converging views, singing consonant tunes, or dancing to the same beats. They fall into the trend of cleverly equating BJP and Congress with all sorts of whatabouteries used by the sanghis , avoiding discussions on countering the sanghi threat, deliberately underplaying the sanghi -fascist threat and

IPL, Modi & Tharoor: moolah, fireworks, less light!

IPL, Modi & Tharoor. A not so savvy head of IPL, very undiplomatic minister, so much murk, more moolah, great thrill! More off the field than on it! More of fireworks, less of light! IPL (or is it sports as business in general?) seems to be evolving into gigantic world-wide gambling enterprise that is possibly spinning out of control. If it is a legitimate business, why not have proper regulatory system to ensure some transparency? IPL news reeks of insider trading, bid fixing, and what not. For a business of this scale, it is high time there is at least independent third party involvement in managing the auctions. Norms are needed for a business whose valuation does not appear to be based entirely on usual business parameters. And, let those in responsible positions be a little more accountable. Not just tweets and blogs, but by filing legitimate disclosures.